Pre-release Ditto Version 📍 #50
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…Juno and Pathfinder
Everything seems fine vs pathfinder
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ditto Pre-release and Refacto ♻️
This PR aim to upgrade Ditto in order to have a working version for Deoxys Release (Coming Soon) 👽.
Some tests have been reworked and all tests works/are tested versus a Pathfinder full node (v5.0) ✅.
Be sure to compare vs Pathfinder/Juno using a 5.0 version.
I also added a function to compare errors formating 💥
🚧 Im currently working on a second PR in order to have add pending + "works_ok" response formating (Juno and Pathfinder
got similar responses but fields order can be inverted for some tests.